Publications                                                     

Back to homepage

Journal Articles:

Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Apperly, I.A. & Butterfill, S.A,, (In Press). Psychological Review. PDF

Online use of mental state inferences continues to develop in late adolescence. Dumontheil, I., Apperly, I.A., & Blakemore, S.J. (In Press). Developmental Science. PDF

Two routes to perspective: imagination and rule-use may be better than simulation and theorising. Commentary on Mitchell et al. (2009). Apperly, I.A. (In Press). British Journal of Developmental Psychology. PDF

Frontal and parietal lobe involvement in the recognition of pretence and intention. Chiavarino, C., Apperly, I.A. & Humphreys, G.W. (In Press). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.

How do symbols affect 3- to 4-year-olds’ executive function? Evidence from a strategic reasoning task. Apperly, I.A & Carroll, D.J., (In Press). Developmental Science PDF

Studies of adults can inform accounts of theory of mind development.  Apperly, I.A., Samson, D., & Humphreys, G.W. (2009). Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 190-201. PDF

The effect of action goal hierarchy on the coding of object orientation in imitation tasks: Evidence from patients with left parietal lobe damage. Chiavarino, C., Apperly, I.A. & Humphreys, G.W. (2008). Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25)7-8), 1011-1026. PDF

Beyond Simulation-Theory and Theory-Theory: Why social cognitive neuroscience should use its own concepts to study “Theory of Mind”. Apperly, I.A., (2008). Cognition 107, 266-283. PDF

The cost of thinking about false beliefs: Evidence from adult performance on a non-inferential theory of mind task. Apperly, I.A., Back, E., Samson, D. & France, L. (2008). Cognition, 106, 1093-1108. PDF

Choosing between two objects reduces 3-year-olds errors on a reverse-contingency test of executive function. Carroll, D.J., Apperly, I.A & Riggs,K.J. (2007). Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98(3), 184-192. PDF

Error analyses reveal contrasting deficits in "theory of mind": Neuropsychological evidence from a 3-option false belief task.  Samson, D., Apperly, I.A., & Humphreys, G.W. (2007). Neuropsychologia. 45(11), 2561-2569. PDF

Is theory of mind understanding impaired in males with fragile X Syndrome? Grant, C.M., Apperly, I.A. & Oliver, C. (2007). Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(1) 17-28. PDF

Exploring the functional and anatomical bases of mirror-image and anatomical imitation: the role of the frontal lobes. Chiavarino, C., Apperly, I.A. & Humphreys, G.W. (2007). Neuropsychologia, 45(4) 784-795. PDF

The executive demands of strategic reasoning are modified by the way in which children are prompted to think about the task: Evidence from 3-to 4-year-olds. Carroll, D.J., Apperly, I.A. & Riggs,K.J. (2007). Cognitive Development, 22(1), 142-148. PDF

Testing the domain-specificity of a theory of mind deficit in brain-injured patients: evidence for consistent performance on non-verbal, 'reality-unknown' false belief and false photograph tasks. Apperly, I.A., Samson, D., Chiavarino, C., Bickerton, W. & Humphreys, G.W. (2007). Cognition, 103, 300-321. PDF

Intact 1st and 2nd order false belief reasoning in a patient with severely impaired grammar.  Apperly, I.A., Samson, D., Carroll, N., Hussain, S., & Humphreys, G.W. (2006). Social Neuroscience, Special issue on theory of mind, 1(3-4), 334-348. PDF

Children's Sensitivity to Their Own Relative Ignorance: Handling of Possibilities Under Conditions of Epistemic and Physical Uncertainty. Robinson, E.J., Rowley, M.J., Beck, S.R., Carroll, D.J., & Apperly, I.A. (2006) Child Development 77(6), 1642-1655. PDF

Is belief reasoning automatic? Apperly, I.A., Riggs, K.J., Simpson, A., Samson, D., & Chiavarino, C. (2006). Psychological Science.17(10) 841-844 PDF

Children’s thinking about counterfactuals and future hypotheticals as possibilities. Beck, S.R., Robinson, E.J., Carroll, D.J., & Apperly, I.A. (2006). Child Development 77(2), 413-426 PDF

Domain-specificity and theory of mind: Evaluating evidence from neuropsychology. Apperly, I.A., Samson, D., & Humphreys, G.W. (2005).  Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(12), 572-577. PDF

Seeing it my way: A case of selective deficit in inhibiting self-perspective. Samson, D., Apperly, I.A., Kathirgamanathan, U. & Humphreys, G.W. (2005).  Brain. 128, 1102-1111. PDF

Frontal and temporo-parietal lobe contribution to Theory of Mind: Neuropsychological evidence from a false belief task with reduced language and executive demands. Apperly, I.A., Samson, D., Chiavarino, C. & Humphreys, G.W. (2004). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(10) 1773-1784 PDF

Three- to four-year-olds’ recognition that symbols have a stable meaning: Pictures are understood before written words. Apperly, I.A., Williams, E. & Williams, J. (2004). Child Development, 75(5) 1510-1522. PDF

The left tempero-parietal junction is necessary for representing someone else’s belief. Samson, D., Apperly, I.A., Chiavarino, C. & Humphreys, G.W. (2004)  Nature Neuroscience, 7(5) 449-500. PDF (Supp. methods)

False belief reasoning and the acquisition of relative clause sentences. Smith, M., Apperly, I.A. & White, V. (2003) Child Development 74(6) 1709-1719 PDF

When can children handle referential opacity? Evidence for systematic variation in 5-6 year old children’s reasoning about beliefs and belief reports. Apperly, I.A. & Robinson, E.J. (2003). Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 85(4) 297-311 PDF

Five year olds’ handling of reference and description in the domains of language and mental representation. Apperly, I.A. & Robinson, E.J. (2002). Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83(1), 53-75 PDF

Children’s difficulties handling dual identity. Apperly, I.A., & Robinson, E.J. (2001).  Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, 374-397. PDF

Problems with partial representations explain children’s related difficulties with ambiguous messages and referentially opaque contexts. Robinson, E.J.  Apperly, I.A. (2001). Cognitive Development. 16(1), 595-615. PDF

Children’s mental representation of referential relations. Apperly, I.A., & Robinson, E.J. (1998). Cognition, 67,287-309. PDF

Adolescents’ and adults’ views about the evidential basis for beliefs: Relativism and determinism re-examined. Robinson, E.J.  Apperly, I.A. (1998). Developmental Science, 1 279-290.

 

Other articles:

Theory of mind.  Apperly, I.A. (In Press) In Bruce Goldstein (Ed.) Enclyclopaedia of Perception. Sage.

 

Articles under submission are available on request

Seeing it your way: Evidence for altercentric intrusion effects in visual perspective taking. Samson, D., Apperly, I.A., Braithwaite, J. & Andrews, B. (Under submission).

The Computation of Belief-like States: Evidence for an Efficient Though Inflexible Mechanism in Adults. Wang, J.J., Apperly, I.A., Samson, D. & Braithwaite, J.J. (Under submission)

Two sources of evidence on the non-automaticity of true and false belief ascription. Back, E., & Apperly, I.A. (under submission).

Why are there limits on theory of mind use? Evidence from adults’ ability to follow instructions from an ignorant speaker. Apperly, I.A., Carroll, D.J., Samson,D., Qureshi, A., Humphreys, G.W. & Moffatt, G. (Under submission).

How do novel response modes help 3- to 4-year-olds to act on rules that induce response conflict? Carroll, D.J., Apperly, I.A & Riggs,K.J. (Under submission).

Frontal and parietal lobe involvement in the recognition of pretence and intention. Chiavarino, C., Apperly, I.A. & Humphreys, G.W. (Under submission).

 

Thesis:    

Children's mental representation of referential relations: Representational partitioning and 'theory of mind'. University of Birmingham, 1999. Supervised by Prof. Elizabeth Robinson.